Tek Basamaklı Sözel Kelime Problemlerinin Sanal Soyut-Yarı Somut-Somut Model ile Öğretimi Hakkında Yetersizliği Olan Öğrencilerin Görüşlerinin İncelenmesi
Alter, P., Brown, E. T., & Pyle, J. (2011). A strategy-based intervention to improve math word
problem-solving skills of students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Education
and Treatment of Children, 34(1), 535-550.
Bouck, E., Satsangi, R., Doughty, T., & Courtney, W. (2014). Virtual and concrete
manipulatives: A comparison of approaches for solving mathematics problems for
students with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism & Developmental
Disorders, 44(1), 180-193. doi:10.1007/s10803-013-1863-2
Bouck, E., Working, C., & Bone, E. (2017). Manipulative apps to support students with disabilities in mathematics. Intervention in School and Clinic, 53(8), 1-6.
Burns, M. K., Walick, C., Simonson, G. R., Dominguez, L., Harelstad, L., Kincaid, A., &
Nelson, G. S. (2015). Using a conceptual understanding and procedural fluency heuristic
to target math interventions with students in early elementary. Learning Disabilities
Research & Practice, 30(2), 52-60. doi:10.1111/ldrp.12056
Butler, F. M., Miller, S. P., Crehan, K., Babbitt, B., & Pierce, T. (2003). Fraction instruction for
students with mathematics disabilities: Comparing two teaching sequences. Learning
Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 99-111. doi:10.1111/1540-5826.00066
Flores, M. M. (2009). Teaching subtraction with regrouping to students experiencing difficulty in
mathematics. Preventing School Failure, 53(3), 145-152.
Flores, M. M. (2010). Using the concrete-representational-abstract sequence to teacher
subtraction with regrouping to students at risk for failure. Remedial and Special
Education, 31(3), 195–207.
Flores, M. M., Hinton, V. M., & Schweck, K. B. (2014). Teaching multiplication with
regrouping to students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research &
Practice, 29(4), 171-183. doi:10.1111/ldrp.12043
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1965). The constant comparative method of qualitative
analysis. Social problems, 12(4), 436-445.
Gersten, R., Chard, D. J., Jayanthi, M., Baker, S. K., Morphy, P., & Flojo, J. (2008).
Mathematics instruction for students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of
instructional components. Review of Educational Research, 79(3), 1202–1242.
Harris, C. A., Miller, S. P., & Mercer, C. D. (1995). The initial multiplication skills to students
with disabilities in general education classrooms. Learning Disabilities Research &
Practice, 10(3), 180-195.
Jitendra, A. K., George, M. P., Stood, S., & Price, K. (2010). Schema-based instruction:
Facilitating mathematical word problem solving for students with emotional and
behavioral disorders. Preventing School Failure, 54(3), 145-151. doi:
Kelly, C. A. (2006). Using manipulatives in mathematical problem solving: A performance-based
analysis. The Mathematics Enthusiast 3(2), 183-193. Retrieved from:
Maccini, P., Strickland, T., Gagnon, J. C., & Malmgren K. (2008). Accessing the general
education math curriculum for secondary students with high-incidence disabilities. Focus
on Exceptional Children, 40(8), 1-32.
Martin, T. (2007). Physically distributed learning with virtual manipulatives for elementary
mathematics. In Robinson, D. H. & Schraw, G., Recent innovations in educational
technology that facilitate student learning (253-274). Charlotte, NC: Information Age
Martin, T., & Lukong, A. (April, 2005). Virtual manipulatives: How effective are they and why?
Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Conference,
Mercer, C. D., & Miller, S. P. (1992). Teaching students with learning problems in math to
acquire, understand, and apply basic, math facts. Remedial and Special Education, 13,
Morin, V. A., & Miller, S. P. (1998). Teaching multiplication to middle school students with
mental retardation. Education and Treatment of Children, 21(1), 22-36.
Moyer, P. S. (2001). Are we having fun yet? How teachers use manipulatives to teach
mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 47, 175-197.
Mulcahy, C. A. & Krezmien, M. P. (2009). Effects of a contextualized instructional package on
the mathematics performance of secondary students with EBD. Behavioral Disorders,
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school
mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School
Officers. (2010). Common core state standards (mathematics). Author. Retrieved from
Ok, M. W. & Kim, W. (2017). Use of iPads and iPods for academic performance and engagement of pre-k-12 students with disabilities: A research synthesis. Exceptionality, 25(1), 54-75.
Ozdemir, R. (2017). The investigation of virtual concrete-representational-abstract model to teach one digit multiplication word problem to students with emotional and behavioral disorders (Order No. 10284142). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (1926728075).
Peltier, C. & Vannest, K. J. (2016a). Schema-based strategy instruction and the mathematical
problem-solving performance of two students with emotional and behavioral disorders.
Education and Treatment of Children, 39(4), 521-544.
Peltier, C. & Vannest, K. J. (2016b). Utilizing the STAR strategy to improve the mathematical
problem-solving abilities of students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Beyond
Behavior, 25(1), 9-15.
Peterson, S. K., Mercer, C. D., & O’Shea, L. (1988). Teaching learning disabled students place
value using the concrete to abstract sequence. Learning Disabilities Research, 4, 52-56.
Reimer, K., & Moyer, P. S. (2005). Third-graders learn about fractions using virtual
manipulatives: A classroom study. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science
Teaching, 24(1), 5-25.
Root, J. R., Browder, D. M., Saunders, A. F., Lo, Y. (2017). Schema-based instruction with
concrete and virtual manipulatives to teach problem solving to students with autism.
Remedial and Special Education, 38(1), 42-52. doi: 10.1177/0741932516643592
Satsangi, R., Bouck, E. C., Taber-Doughty, T., Bofferding, L., & Roberts, C. A. (2016).
Comparing the effectiveness of virtual and concrete manipulatives to teach algebra to
secondary students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 39(4), 240-
Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures
for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
Suh, J., & Moyer, P. S. (2007). Developing students' representational fluency using virtual and
physical algebra balances. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching,
Witzel, B.S., Riccomini, P. J., & Schneider, E. (2008). Implementing CRA with secondary
students with learning disabilities in mathematics. Intervention in School and Clinic,
- Şu halde refbacks yoktur.